- Number of trips made for the service
|
- Average travel cost of making each trip
|
- Average waiting time in each trip
|
- Estimate of wage loss due to time spent in availing the service
|
- Total time elapsed in availing service
|
- Amount paid as bribe to functionaries
|
- Amount paid to agents to facilitate service
|
Overall Assessment |
- Preference for manual versus computerized systems
|
- Composite score: Measured on a 5-point scale factoring in the key attributes of a delivery system that are seen as being important by users
|
Quality of Service: Interaction with staff, complaint handling, privacy, accuracy measured on a 5-point scale |
- Satisfaction with the location of the service delivery center/office
|
- Convenience of working hours of the service delivery center/office
|
- Overall attitude of the functionaries in terms of courteousness and friendliness
|
- Timeliness of response to queries by clients
|
- Satisfaction with the mechanism for complaint handling and problem resolution
|
- Perception about the confidentiality and security of data
|
- Satisfaction with the overall quality of service
|
Quality of Governance: Transparency, participation, accountability, corruption measured on a 5-point scale |
- Level of corruption in the current working system
|
- Awareness about the citizen charter
|
- Adherence of the time frame for service delivery (elapsed time) to that specified in citizen’s charter
|
- Financial loss due to delay in availing the service
|
- Type/kind of financial loss incurred due to delay in availing the service
|
- Extent to which government officials can be held accountable for their actions
|
- Whether the rules and procedures are simple and stated clearly
|
- Whether the agency takes responsibility for the information shared
|
- Does the agency provide any feedback and what is the quality of response to queries?
|
- Perception about the overall quality of governance
|